Iran is prepared to resume nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.
Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared recent overtures had come from go-betweens to resume talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.
Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.
He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.
The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries used their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.
Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.
It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".
Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.
Trump in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a spectacle.
In his remarks to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the attacks began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.
Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.
Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the ultimate solution to address disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."
"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent approach."
In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."
He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."
A passionate cyclist and outdoor writer sharing stories from UK trails and urban rides.